cathodal current pulses Search Results


transcranial electrical stimulation  (Digitimer North America LLC)
96
Digitimer North America LLC transcranial electrical stimulation
Figure 3 Results from MMEP assessments, ladder climbing and rotating rod tests, which depend more strongly on supraspinal locomotion control. Note the lack of differences between sham-operated and mild SCI animals in all but one (the backward locomotion rotating rod test) motor test in the chronic stage post injury. (a) Falling latencies during rotating rod testing with forward locomotion. Only differences between mild and moderate SCI animals, not sham and mild, or moderate and severe SCI animals, were significant (repeated measures ANOVA) at all three time points (Bonferroni post hoc: Po0.01). (b) Falling latencies during backward locomotion rotating rod testing. The backward locomotion rotating rod test was the only test that showed significant differences between sham-operated, mild and moderate SCI animals on every time point (Bonferroni post hoc: Pp0.01). (c) Myogenic motor-evoked potentials measured in the M. gastrocnemius after <t>transcranial</t> electric <t>stimulation</t> at 6 weeks post injury. A statistically significant drop in evoked potentials was only observed from mild to moderate SCI (one-way ANOVA: Po0.05). (d) Number of correct steps/paw placements while climbing the rungs of a 551 inclined ladder. Differences at 6 weeks post injury were only significant between mild and moderate SCI animals (Bonferroni: Po0.001). (e) Representative myogenic motor-evoked potentials measured in the gastrocnemius muscle (i.e. below injury level) after transcranial electric stimulation of the motor cortex at 6 weeks post injury (see panel c for quantification). *,** and *** correspond to P-values of o0.05, o0.01 and o0.001, respectively, and are only displayed at the latest time point on which two consecutive injury severity groups showed significant differences.
Transcranial Electrical Stimulation, supplied by Digitimer North America LLC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/transcranial electrical stimulation/product/Digitimer North America LLC
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
transcranial electrical stimulation - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
microarray electrode 1  (Alpha MED Scientific)
90
Alpha MED Scientific microarray electrode 1
Figure 3 Results from MMEP assessments, ladder climbing and rotating rod tests, which depend more strongly on supraspinal locomotion control. Note the lack of differences between sham-operated and mild SCI animals in all but one (the backward locomotion rotating rod test) motor test in the chronic stage post injury. (a) Falling latencies during rotating rod testing with forward locomotion. Only differences between mild and moderate SCI animals, not sham and mild, or moderate and severe SCI animals, were significant (repeated measures ANOVA) at all three time points (Bonferroni post hoc: Po0.01). (b) Falling latencies during backward locomotion rotating rod testing. The backward locomotion rotating rod test was the only test that showed significant differences between sham-operated, mild and moderate SCI animals on every time point (Bonferroni post hoc: Pp0.01). (c) Myogenic motor-evoked potentials measured in the M. gastrocnemius after <t>transcranial</t> electric <t>stimulation</t> at 6 weeks post injury. A statistically significant drop in evoked potentials was only observed from mild to moderate SCI (one-way ANOVA: Po0.05). (d) Number of correct steps/paw placements while climbing the rungs of a 551 inclined ladder. Differences at 6 weeks post injury were only significant between mild and moderate SCI animals (Bonferroni: Po0.001). (e) Representative myogenic motor-evoked potentials measured in the gastrocnemius muscle (i.e. below injury level) after transcranial electric stimulation of the motor cortex at 6 weeks post injury (see panel c for quantification). *,** and *** correspond to P-values of o0.05, o0.01 and o0.001, respectively, and are only displayed at the latest time point on which two consecutive injury severity groups showed significant differences.
Microarray Electrode 1, supplied by Alpha MED Scientific, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/microarray electrode 1/product/Alpha MED Scientific
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
microarray electrode 1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
custom-built sigenics stimulator  (Sigenics Inc)
90
Sigenics Inc custom-built sigenics stimulator
Figure 3 Results from MMEP assessments, ladder climbing and rotating rod tests, which depend more strongly on supraspinal locomotion control. Note the lack of differences between sham-operated and mild SCI animals in all but one (the backward locomotion rotating rod test) motor test in the chronic stage post injury. (a) Falling latencies during rotating rod testing with forward locomotion. Only differences between mild and moderate SCI animals, not sham and mild, or moderate and severe SCI animals, were significant (repeated measures ANOVA) at all three time points (Bonferroni post hoc: Po0.01). (b) Falling latencies during backward locomotion rotating rod testing. The backward locomotion rotating rod test was the only test that showed significant differences between sham-operated, mild and moderate SCI animals on every time point (Bonferroni post hoc: Pp0.01). (c) Myogenic motor-evoked potentials measured in the M. gastrocnemius after <t>transcranial</t> electric <t>stimulation</t> at 6 weeks post injury. A statistically significant drop in evoked potentials was only observed from mild to moderate SCI (one-way ANOVA: Po0.05). (d) Number of correct steps/paw placements while climbing the rungs of a 551 inclined ladder. Differences at 6 weeks post injury were only significant between mild and moderate SCI animals (Bonferroni: Po0.001). (e) Representative myogenic motor-evoked potentials measured in the gastrocnemius muscle (i.e. below injury level) after transcranial electric stimulation of the motor cortex at 6 weeks post injury (see panel c for quantification). *,** and *** correspond to P-values of o0.05, o0.01 and o0.001, respectively, and are only displayed at the latest time point on which two consecutive injury severity groups showed significant differences.
Custom Built Sigenics Stimulator, supplied by Sigenics Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/custom-built sigenics stimulator/product/Sigenics Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
custom-built sigenics stimulator - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
quantum computing  (EcoDesign Inc)
90
EcoDesign Inc quantum computing
Figure 3 Results from MMEP assessments, ladder climbing and rotating rod tests, which depend more strongly on supraspinal locomotion control. Note the lack of differences between sham-operated and mild SCI animals in all but one (the backward locomotion rotating rod test) motor test in the chronic stage post injury. (a) Falling latencies during rotating rod testing with forward locomotion. Only differences between mild and moderate SCI animals, not sham and mild, or moderate and severe SCI animals, were significant (repeated measures ANOVA) at all three time points (Bonferroni post hoc: Po0.01). (b) Falling latencies during backward locomotion rotating rod testing. The backward locomotion rotating rod test was the only test that showed significant differences between sham-operated, mild and moderate SCI animals on every time point (Bonferroni post hoc: Pp0.01). (c) Myogenic motor-evoked potentials measured in the M. gastrocnemius after <t>transcranial</t> electric <t>stimulation</t> at 6 weeks post injury. A statistically significant drop in evoked potentials was only observed from mild to moderate SCI (one-way ANOVA: Po0.05). (d) Number of correct steps/paw placements while climbing the rungs of a 551 inclined ladder. Differences at 6 weeks post injury were only significant between mild and moderate SCI animals (Bonferroni: Po0.001). (e) Representative myogenic motor-evoked potentials measured in the gastrocnemius muscle (i.e. below injury level) after transcranial electric stimulation of the motor cortex at 6 weeks post injury (see panel c for quantification). *,** and *** correspond to P-values of o0.05, o0.01 and o0.001, respectively, and are only displayed at the latest time point on which two consecutive injury severity groups showed significant differences.
Quantum Computing, supplied by EcoDesign Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/quantum computing/product/EcoDesign Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
quantum computing - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
oscilloscope lecroy wr204xi  (LeCroy Corporation)
90
LeCroy Corporation oscilloscope lecroy wr204xi
Figure 3 Results from MMEP assessments, ladder climbing and rotating rod tests, which depend more strongly on supraspinal locomotion control. Note the lack of differences between sham-operated and mild SCI animals in all but one (the backward locomotion rotating rod test) motor test in the chronic stage post injury. (a) Falling latencies during rotating rod testing with forward locomotion. Only differences between mild and moderate SCI animals, not sham and mild, or moderate and severe SCI animals, were significant (repeated measures ANOVA) at all three time points (Bonferroni post hoc: Po0.01). (b) Falling latencies during backward locomotion rotating rod testing. The backward locomotion rotating rod test was the only test that showed significant differences between sham-operated, mild and moderate SCI animals on every time point (Bonferroni post hoc: Pp0.01). (c) Myogenic motor-evoked potentials measured in the M. gastrocnemius after <t>transcranial</t> electric <t>stimulation</t> at 6 weeks post injury. A statistically significant drop in evoked potentials was only observed from mild to moderate SCI (one-way ANOVA: Po0.05). (d) Number of correct steps/paw placements while climbing the rungs of a 551 inclined ladder. Differences at 6 weeks post injury were only significant between mild and moderate SCI animals (Bonferroni: Po0.001). (e) Representative myogenic motor-evoked potentials measured in the gastrocnemius muscle (i.e. below injury level) after transcranial electric stimulation of the motor cortex at 6 weeks post injury (see panel c for quantification). *,** and *** correspond to P-values of o0.05, o0.01 and o0.001, respectively, and are only displayed at the latest time point on which two consecutive injury severity groups showed significant differences.
Oscilloscope Lecroy Wr204xi, supplied by LeCroy Corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/oscilloscope lecroy wr204xi/product/LeCroy Corporation
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
oscilloscope lecroy wr204xi - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
sweat glands  (EcoDesign Inc)
90
EcoDesign Inc sweat glands
Figure 3 Results from MMEP assessments, ladder climbing and rotating rod tests, which depend more strongly on supraspinal locomotion control. Note the lack of differences between sham-operated and mild SCI animals in all but one (the backward locomotion rotating rod test) motor test in the chronic stage post injury. (a) Falling latencies during rotating rod testing with forward locomotion. Only differences between mild and moderate SCI animals, not sham and mild, or moderate and severe SCI animals, were significant (repeated measures ANOVA) at all three time points (Bonferroni post hoc: Po0.01). (b) Falling latencies during backward locomotion rotating rod testing. The backward locomotion rotating rod test was the only test that showed significant differences between sham-operated, mild and moderate SCI animals on every time point (Bonferroni post hoc: Pp0.01). (c) Myogenic motor-evoked potentials measured in the M. gastrocnemius after <t>transcranial</t> electric <t>stimulation</t> at 6 weeks post injury. A statistically significant drop in evoked potentials was only observed from mild to moderate SCI (one-way ANOVA: Po0.05). (d) Number of correct steps/paw placements while climbing the rungs of a 551 inclined ladder. Differences at 6 weeks post injury were only significant between mild and moderate SCI animals (Bonferroni: Po0.001). (e) Representative myogenic motor-evoked potentials measured in the gastrocnemius muscle (i.e. below injury level) after transcranial electric stimulation of the motor cortex at 6 weeks post injury (see panel c for quantification). *,** and *** correspond to P-values of o0.05, o0.01 and o0.001, respectively, and are only displayed at the latest time point on which two consecutive injury severity groups showed significant differences.
Sweat Glands, supplied by EcoDesign Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/sweat glands/product/EcoDesign Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
sweat glands - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
constant current stimulator  (Sigenics Inc)
90
Sigenics Inc constant current stimulator
Figure 3 Results from MMEP assessments, ladder climbing and rotating rod tests, which depend more strongly on supraspinal locomotion control. Note the lack of differences between sham-operated and mild SCI animals in all but one (the backward locomotion rotating rod test) motor test in the chronic stage post injury. (a) Falling latencies during rotating rod testing with forward locomotion. Only differences between mild and moderate SCI animals, not sham and mild, or moderate and severe SCI animals, were significant (repeated measures ANOVA) at all three time points (Bonferroni post hoc: Po0.01). (b) Falling latencies during backward locomotion rotating rod testing. The backward locomotion rotating rod test was the only test that showed significant differences between sham-operated, mild and moderate SCI animals on every time point (Bonferroni post hoc: Pp0.01). (c) Myogenic motor-evoked potentials measured in the M. gastrocnemius after <t>transcranial</t> electric <t>stimulation</t> at 6 weeks post injury. A statistically significant drop in evoked potentials was only observed from mild to moderate SCI (one-way ANOVA: Po0.05). (d) Number of correct steps/paw placements while climbing the rungs of a 551 inclined ladder. Differences at 6 weeks post injury were only significant between mild and moderate SCI animals (Bonferroni: Po0.001). (e) Representative myogenic motor-evoked potentials measured in the gastrocnemius muscle (i.e. below injury level) after transcranial electric stimulation of the motor cortex at 6 weeks post injury (see panel c for quantification). *,** and *** correspond to P-values of o0.05, o0.01 and o0.001, respectively, and are only displayed at the latest time point on which two consecutive injury severity groups showed significant differences.
Constant Current Stimulator, supplied by Sigenics Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/constant current stimulator/product/Sigenics Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
constant current stimulator - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
tdcs dc-stimulator-pulse m  (neuroConn GmbH)
90
neuroConn GmbH tdcs dc-stimulator-pulse m
Figure 3 Results from MMEP assessments, ladder climbing and rotating rod tests, which depend more strongly on supraspinal locomotion control. Note the lack of differences between sham-operated and mild SCI animals in all but one (the backward locomotion rotating rod test) motor test in the chronic stage post injury. (a) Falling latencies during rotating rod testing with forward locomotion. Only differences between mild and moderate SCI animals, not sham and mild, or moderate and severe SCI animals, were significant (repeated measures ANOVA) at all three time points (Bonferroni post hoc: Po0.01). (b) Falling latencies during backward locomotion rotating rod testing. The backward locomotion rotating rod test was the only test that showed significant differences between sham-operated, mild and moderate SCI animals on every time point (Bonferroni post hoc: Pp0.01). (c) Myogenic motor-evoked potentials measured in the M. gastrocnemius after <t>transcranial</t> electric <t>stimulation</t> at 6 weeks post injury. A statistically significant drop in evoked potentials was only observed from mild to moderate SCI (one-way ANOVA: Po0.05). (d) Number of correct steps/paw placements while climbing the rungs of a 551 inclined ladder. Differences at 6 weeks post injury were only significant between mild and moderate SCI animals (Bonferroni: Po0.001). (e) Representative myogenic motor-evoked potentials measured in the gastrocnemius muscle (i.e. below injury level) after transcranial electric stimulation of the motor cortex at 6 weeks post injury (see panel c for quantification). *,** and *** correspond to P-values of o0.05, o0.01 and o0.001, respectively, and are only displayed at the latest time point on which two consecutive injury severity groups showed significant differences.
Tdcs Dc Stimulator Pulse M, supplied by neuroConn GmbH, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/tdcs dc-stimulator-pulse m/product/neuroConn GmbH
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
tdcs dc-stimulator-pulse m - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
potentiostat metrohm autolab m204  (Metrohm AG)
90
Metrohm AG potentiostat metrohm autolab m204
Figure 3 Results from MMEP assessments, ladder climbing and rotating rod tests, which depend more strongly on supraspinal locomotion control. Note the lack of differences between sham-operated and mild SCI animals in all but one (the backward locomotion rotating rod test) motor test in the chronic stage post injury. (a) Falling latencies during rotating rod testing with forward locomotion. Only differences between mild and moderate SCI animals, not sham and mild, or moderate and severe SCI animals, were significant (repeated measures ANOVA) at all three time points (Bonferroni post hoc: Po0.01). (b) Falling latencies during backward locomotion rotating rod testing. The backward locomotion rotating rod test was the only test that showed significant differences between sham-operated, mild and moderate SCI animals on every time point (Bonferroni post hoc: Pp0.01). (c) Myogenic motor-evoked potentials measured in the M. gastrocnemius after <t>transcranial</t> electric <t>stimulation</t> at 6 weeks post injury. A statistically significant drop in evoked potentials was only observed from mild to moderate SCI (one-way ANOVA: Po0.05). (d) Number of correct steps/paw placements while climbing the rungs of a 551 inclined ladder. Differences at 6 weeks post injury were only significant between mild and moderate SCI animals (Bonferroni: Po0.001). (e) Representative myogenic motor-evoked potentials measured in the gastrocnemius muscle (i.e. below injury level) after transcranial electric stimulation of the motor cortex at 6 weeks post injury (see panel c for quantification). *,** and *** correspond to P-values of o0.05, o0.01 and o0.001, respectively, and are only displayed at the latest time point on which two consecutive injury severity groups showed significant differences.
Potentiostat Metrohm Autolab M204, supplied by Metrohm AG, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/potentiostat metrohm autolab m204/product/Metrohm AG
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
potentiostat metrohm autolab m204 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Figure 3 Results from MMEP assessments, ladder climbing and rotating rod tests, which depend more strongly on supraspinal locomotion control. Note the lack of differences between sham-operated and mild SCI animals in all but one (the backward locomotion rotating rod test) motor test in the chronic stage post injury. (a) Falling latencies during rotating rod testing with forward locomotion. Only differences between mild and moderate SCI animals, not sham and mild, or moderate and severe SCI animals, were significant (repeated measures ANOVA) at all three time points (Bonferroni post hoc: Po0.01). (b) Falling latencies during backward locomotion rotating rod testing. The backward locomotion rotating rod test was the only test that showed significant differences between sham-operated, mild and moderate SCI animals on every time point (Bonferroni post hoc: Pp0.01). (c) Myogenic motor-evoked potentials measured in the M. gastrocnemius after transcranial electric stimulation at 6 weeks post injury. A statistically significant drop in evoked potentials was only observed from mild to moderate SCI (one-way ANOVA: Po0.05). (d) Number of correct steps/paw placements while climbing the rungs of a 551 inclined ladder. Differences at 6 weeks post injury were only significant between mild and moderate SCI animals (Bonferroni: Po0.001). (e) Representative myogenic motor-evoked potentials measured in the gastrocnemius muscle (i.e. below injury level) after transcranial electric stimulation of the motor cortex at 6 weeks post injury (see panel c for quantification). *,** and *** correspond to P-values of o0.05, o0.01 and o0.001, respectively, and are only displayed at the latest time point on which two consecutive injury severity groups showed significant differences.

Journal: Spinal cord

Article Title: Translation of the rat thoracic contusion model; part 2 - forward versus backward locomotion testing.

doi: 10.1038/sc.2014.73

Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 3 Results from MMEP assessments, ladder climbing and rotating rod tests, which depend more strongly on supraspinal locomotion control. Note the lack of differences between sham-operated and mild SCI animals in all but one (the backward locomotion rotating rod test) motor test in the chronic stage post injury. (a) Falling latencies during rotating rod testing with forward locomotion. Only differences between mild and moderate SCI animals, not sham and mild, or moderate and severe SCI animals, were significant (repeated measures ANOVA) at all three time points (Bonferroni post hoc: Po0.01). (b) Falling latencies during backward locomotion rotating rod testing. The backward locomotion rotating rod test was the only test that showed significant differences between sham-operated, mild and moderate SCI animals on every time point (Bonferroni post hoc: Pp0.01). (c) Myogenic motor-evoked potentials measured in the M. gastrocnemius after transcranial electric stimulation at 6 weeks post injury. A statistically significant drop in evoked potentials was only observed from mild to moderate SCI (one-way ANOVA: Po0.05). (d) Number of correct steps/paw placements while climbing the rungs of a 551 inclined ladder. Differences at 6 weeks post injury were only significant between mild and moderate SCI animals (Bonferroni: Po0.001). (e) Representative myogenic motor-evoked potentials measured in the gastrocnemius muscle (i.e. below injury level) after transcranial electric stimulation of the motor cortex at 6 weeks post injury (see panel c for quantification). *,** and *** correspond to P-values of o0.05, o0.01 and o0.001, respectively, and are only displayed at the latest time point on which two consecutive injury severity groups showed significant differences.

Article Snippet: MMEPs were elicited by transcranial electrical stimulation (with a pulse duration of 1ms at 7mA using a DS3 constant current isolated stimulator (Digitimer, Welwyn Garden City, UK)) of the motor cortex using two percutaneously placed 30G stainless steel stimulation electrodes.

Techniques: Control